SEASON GREETINGS

SELENA GOMEZ GETS MAD

Selena Gomez slams haters after Victoria's Secret Fashion Show performance

By ZACH SEEMAYER ET ONLINE

While no one can deny that Selena Gomez looked amazing during her performance at this year's Victoria's Secret Fashion Show, some were questioning whether or not the "Copyright (c) 2015 CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.Good for You" singer was singing live.

On Tuesday, while the Victoria's Secret Fashion Show aired on television, Victoria's Secret posted a striking photo of Gomez basked in an angelic light after one of her two performances.

However, a number of commenters suggested that the 23-year-old performer might have been performing to a pre-recorded track. Instagram user melzblush_4 posed the question, "She sings live?"

Gomez took to the comments section to seemingly defend her performance, strongly writing, "Yes I f**king sing live."

While some commenters weren't sold, there were a slew of fans who came to Selena's defense. "Be strong and ignore the haters," Instagram user ProudOfQueenSelena, a Selena Gomez fan, wrote.

Gomez has not yet addressed the criticism on any of her own social media platforms, but it's clear she feels strongly about defending her ability to sing live.
Copyright (c) 2015 CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.

MY VIEW:

It is sad that people who have nothing better to do than to criticize celebrities. It is obvious there are quite a few pathetic critics who must be jealous enough to waste time on saying negative things about celebrities. I wish they could find better things to do with their time but unfortunately they can only get attention when they are being negative so that's what they do. Do these people know what charities Selene Gomez contributes to? Or for that matter have they ever done anything for their community because being a critic? Life is so precious. Time is only but an instant in our lives and yet we fest on being negative. What a bitter world we have become!!! Selene, ignore the fools and keep on being you!!!

Brenda A. Ysaguirre

DONALD TRUMP GOES TOO FAR

WASHINGTON, Dec 8 (Reuters) - The White House on Tuesday said Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump's call for the United States to ban Muslims from entering the country disqualified him from becoming president and called on Republicans to reject him immediately.

White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Trump's campaign had a "dustbin of history" quality to it and said his comments were offensive and toxic.

Earnest said other Republican presidential candidates, who have pledged to support the person who eventually wins their party's nomination, should disavow Trump "right now."

My View:

Donald Trump continues to show us how asinine he is. Money is the root of his big mouth. Americans who full this bigot are blind and love the loud noise that he makes. It is time for everyone to step back and evaluate just what Trump stands for. Is America ready to have this country built on immigrants, founded on freedom for all and the American dream and the home of the Brave and just the strongest country in the world become a laughing stock of the world. Just because Trump is being so forceful does not mean he will make a good president. His "show" every time he gets in front of the camera and at a microphone is just as ridiculous as can be and the Piper is blowing this country straight into the water. We will drown with him is left to be seen!

F.B.I. Treating San Bernardino Attack as Terrorism Case

WIFE LOYAL TO ISIS 
FBI: 'ACT OF TERROR'

WASHINGTON — The woman who, with her husband, killed 14 people in San Bernardino pledged allegiance to the Islamic State in a Facebook post the day of the attack, officials said Friday, and the F.B.I. announced it was treating the massacre as an act of terrorism.

Continue reading the main story“The investigation so far has developed indications of radicalization by the killers, and of potential inspiration by foreign terrorist organizations,” the F.B.I. director, James Comey, said at a news conference here. But, he said: “so far we have no indication that these killers are part of an organized larger group, or form part of a cell. There’s no indication that they are part of a network.”

Tashfeen Malik’s declaration of allegiance to the Islamic State was posted on Facebook about 11 a.m. Wednesday, roughly the time of the shooting, according to people briefed on the investigation. At a news conference in San Bernardino, David Bowdich, the F.B.I. assistant director in charge of the Los Angeles office, said he was aware of the post, but would not say how much it influenced the decision to investigate the massacre as an act of terrorism, or what other information played a role in that shift.

“There’s a number of pieces of evidence which has essentially pushed us off the cliff to say we are considering this an act of terrorism,” he said. Even as its counterterrorism unit was overseeing the investigation, the F.B.I. previously said that terrorism was just one possibility. With the decision to call this a terrorism case, the bureau took over the investigation into the deadliest terrorist assault on American soil since the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks. A 2009 rampage at the Fort Hood military base killed 13. There is no evidence that the Islamic State directed Ms. Malik and her husband, Syed Rizwan Farook, to stage the attacks, law enforcement officials said. But the Facebook post has led investigators to believe that the couple, who were killed in a shootout with the police after the attack, took inspiration from the group, they said. 

“At this point we believe they were more self-radicalized and inspire d by the group than actually told to do the shooting,” one official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity because the investigation is continuing. The Islamic State has not released an official statement on the San Bernardino attack, but the Amaq News Agency, which intelligence officials believe is run by Islamic State supporters, released a statement claiming that the killings had been carried out by “supporters of the Islamic State,” according to a translation provided by the SITE Intelligence Group. Islamic terrorists have used the oath of allegiance, called a bayat, to declare their loyalty to specific groups and leaders. To become a member of Al Qaeda, for instance, terrorists historically swore their devotion to Osama bin Laden.

Investigators are scouring the contents of computers, cellphones and other devices belonging to Ms. Malik and Mr. Farook, including items they attempted to destroy and files they tried to erase; investigators found two cellphones, which had been crushed, in a trash can near their home.

“We are going through a very large volume of electronic evidence,” Mr. Comey said. “This is electronic evidence that these killers tried to destroy and tried to conceal from us.”

That effort to erase the couple’s electronic footprints, and other evidence, like the 12 pipe bombs they had made and stored in their townhouse and garage, have led authorities to believe that the assault was premeditated.

Asked if the couple had been planning more attacks, Mr. Bowdich said, “it’s certainly a possibility we’re looking at.” He said the electronic devices might prove critical to revealing their motivations. “I truly believe that’s going to be the potential golden nuggets,” he said.

On Wednesday morning, law enforcement officials say, Mr. Farook and Ms. Malik walked into a conference center at Inland Regional Center, a social services center, and gunned down people at a combination training session and holiday lunch held by the county health department. Most of the victims were co-workers of Mr. Farook, who worked for the department as a health inspector.

he Facebook posting, which had been removed from the social media site, provides one of the first significant clues to the role that Ms. Malik, 29, played in the attacks.

She was born in Pakistan, and traveled on a Pakistani passport, but grew up in Saudi Arabia, according to Mustafa H. Kuko, director of the Islamic Center of Riverside, which Mr. Farook attended for a few years.

“They were living in Saudi Arabia, but they were Pakistanis,” he said. “They had been in Saudi Arabia for a long time. She grew up in the city of Jeddah.”

A person close to the Saudi government confirmed that Ms. Malik had spent time in Saudi Arabia over the years, staying with her father there, adding that Saudi intelligence agencies had no information that she had any ties to militant groups, and that she was not on any terrorism watch lists.

Ms. Malik returned to Pakistan for college, graduating in 2012 from Bahauddin Zakariya University in Multan with a degree in pharmacy, according to local officials in the Layyah District of Punjab Province. They said that her family was originally from a town there, Karor Lal East, and that her father, Malik Gulzar Aulakh, moved with his family to Saudi Arabia about 20 years ago, later moving to the United States; American officials have not confirmed that. Officials in Layyah said intelligence officials visited on Friday and were looking for relatives of Ms. Malik.

Pakistani officials consider the area a center of support for extremist jihadist groups, including Lashkar-e-Taiba. Some of the most high-profile attacks against the Pakistani military in 2009 were led by a native of the same rural area: Umar Kundi, a medical doctor who became an operative for Al Qaeda. In addition, Multan, an ancient city in Punjab, is considered a hotbed of radicalism.

A Pakistani intelligence official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss an continuing investigation, said security officials were looking into Ms. Malik’s time in Pakistan, as well as possible travel there by Mr. Farook.

In recent months, the F.B.I. has been particularly concerned that so-called homegrown extremists might be inspired by the Islamic State to stage attacks in the United States, law enforcement officials say. Even before the attacks in Paris last month, the agency had heavy surveillance on at least three dozen individuals who the authorities were concerned might commit violence in the group’s name.

The F.B.I. refocused its efforts on these individuals earlier this year in response to a shift in tactics by the Islamic State, law enforcement officials said. Instead of trying to persuade Americans to travel to Syria to join the Islamic State, the group began calling on its sympathizers and followers in the United States to commit acts of violence at home.

“We’ve especially focused on the portfolio of people we’re investigating for the potential of being homegrown violent extremists,” the F.B.I. director, Mr. Comey, said last month at a news conference. “That is, people consuming the propaganda. So those investigations are designed to figure out where are they on the spectrum from consuming to acting.”

“Within that group we’re trying to focus on those we think might be at the highest risk of being a copycat,” Mr. Comey said, referring to those who may try to follow the attackers in Paris. “And so we are pressing additional resources, additional focus against those. That’s the dozens.”

On Friday morning, the landlord of the building where Mr. Farook and Ms. Malik lived in Redlands, Calif., allowed journalists into the cramped townhouse near San Bernardino, which investigators had spent nearly two days scouring, leading to the rare sight of dozens of reporters and photographers trampling through what, the day before, had been a crime scene they were not even allowed to approach. Plywood was nailed over the openings where the police and F.B.I. had knocked out the doors and windows of the duplex townhouse, but the sheet of wood across the front entrance had been pried off to allow entry.

In an upstairs bedroom documents including driver’s licenses, credit cards and a Social Security card, all in the name of Mr. Farook’s mother, were strewn across a bed, while tabletops and other surfaces held more papers and books, including copies of the Quran. In the small living room, furniture shared space with a treadmill, a baby bouncer, rolled-up blankets and suitcases, and in the kitchen there was a sink full of dirty dishes and a refrigerator full of food, as if the occupants were expected back at any moment.

Mr. Bowdich dismissed any concerns about the security of the scene and any evidence it might have contained, saying the F.B.I. had completed its search. “Once we turn that location back over to the occupants of that residence, or once we board it up, anyone that goes in, that has nothing to do with us,” he said.

As investigators search for signs of a political or religious motivation for the massacre, the discovery of Ms. Malik’s Facebook posting has forced them to consider whether any radical impetus came primarily from her, rather than her husband.

Mr. Farook, 28, was a United States citizen, born in Illinois, whose parents were from Pakistan. F.B.I. officials came up with no hits when they searched agency databases for his name, according to law enforcement officials. That is significant because it meant that not only was Mr. Farook never the focus of an investigation, he was also never mentioned by anyone else interviewed by the F.B.I., even in unrelated cases.

The bureau, however, has uncovered evidence that Mr. Farook had contact with five individuals on whom the F.B.I. had previously opened investigations for possible terrorist activities, law enforcement officials said. All five inquiries was closed, and the contacts were made a few years ago, not recently, the authorities said.

One individual contacted was associated with the Shabab, the Islamist militant group in Somalia. Another was associated with the Nusra Front, the Qaeda wing in Syria. None of the other three were tied to the Islamic State or core Al Qaeda.

Mr. Comey said the F.B.I. is re-examining those contacts, but added, “I would urge you not to make too much of that.” The agency is also investigating a person, whom it has not identified, who was the original buyer of the two assault rifles used in the attack. Mr. Farook has been identified as the buyer of the two pistols the couple carried.

A cellphone Ms. Malik had with her on Wednesday had almost nothing on it — no social media apps or encrypted apps — leading investigators to suspect that it might have been a “burner phone,” meant to be used and discarded, the officials said.

Mr. Farook had posted profiles on Muslim dating websites, and apparently the couple met online. He told co-workers last year that he was traveling to Saudi Arabia to meet his bride, and both American and Saudi officials have confirmed that he spent more than a week in that country in July 2014.

Mr. Farook, 28, was an American citizen, and he and Ms. Malik traveled to the United States together in July 2014, David Bowdich of the F.B.I. in Los Angeles said at a news conference. He said she had traveled with K-1 visa, a special visa that allows people to come to the country marry an American citizen. A couple has to marry within 90 days; after that the K-1 visa expires.

But people who knew them say they may actually have married in Saudi Arabia, before Ms. Malik ever set foot in the United States, possibly as early as 2013.

Mr. Farook applied for a permanent resident green card for Ms. Malik on Sept. 20, 2014, within the legal 90-day limit, a federal official said. She was granted a conditional green card in July 2015. As a routine matter, to obtain the green card the couple had to prove that their marriage was legitimate. Ms. Malik also had to pass criminal and national security background checks that used F.B.I. and Department of Homeland Security databases.

Michael S. Schmidt reported from Washington and Richard Pérez-Peña from New York. Waqar Gillani contributed reporting from Lahore, Pakistan; Salman Masood from Islamabad; Rukmini Callimachi from New York, and Ian Lovett, Rick Rojas and Jim Wilson from San Bernardino.

Oscar Pistorius guilty of murdering Reeva Steenkamp

Pistorius killed his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp in February 2013 after shooting four times through a locked toilet door.

He is currently under house arrest after spending one year of his original five-year sentence in jail.

Pistorius will have to return to court to be re-sentenced, for murder.

Pistorius, a six-time Paralympic gold medallist whose legs were amputated below the knee as a baby, made history by becoming the first amputee sprinter to compete at the Olympics, in 2012, running on prosthetic "blades".

South Africa's Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that the lower court did not correctly apply the rule of dolus eventualis - whether Pistorius knew that a death would be a likely result of his actions.

The minimum sentence for murder in South Africa is 15 years, but judges can apply some discretion.

South African law does not make provision for someone to be placed under house arrest for more than five years, so Pistorius will be going back to prison, reports the BBC's Pumza Fihlani in Johannesburg.

---

What next for Pistorius?

Will he return to jail?

Yes. He will be back behind bars, less than two months after he was placed under house arrest.

When will he be sentenced?

We don't have a date yet, but it will be next year. The minimum sentence for murder is 15 years, but the judge does have the discretion to lower it.

Can he appeal?

Yes, but only if his lawyers are convinced that the appeal judges violated his constitutional rights. So it's a high threshold, and hard to meet.

So is this the end of Pistorius' professional athletics career?

Almost certainly. He's 29, and will be past his prime by the time he is freed. It is also unlikely that advertisers would want to sponsor him, as the Pistorius brand is now tainted.

Pistorius' family gave a brief response, saying lawyers are studying the finding who will advise them on "options going forward".

The panel of appeal judges described the case as "a human tragedy of Shakespearean proportions" in their written judgement.

Reading the unanimous ruling reached by the five judges, Justice Eric Leach said that having armed himself with a high-calibre weapon, Pistorius must have foreseen that whoever was behind the door might die, especially given his firearms training.

"As a matter of common sense at the time the fatal shots were fired, the possibility of the death of the person behind the door was clearly an obvious result," the judge said.

"And in firing not one but four shots, such a result became even more likely."

Pistorius always maintained that he believed there was an intruder in the house but the judge said that the identity of the person behind the door was "irrelevant to his guilt".

Justice Leach compared it to someone setting off a bomb in a public place not knowing who the victims might be.

---

South African reaction: Pumza Fihlani, BBC News, Johannesburg

In a packed courtroom with Reeva Steenkamp's family listening to every word, the judge said that when Oscar Pistorius decided to fire four shots through a closed toilet door, he had gambled with a person's life - whoever that was.

Under South African law you cannot just shoot - you first need to determine that the threat to your life is real and that there is no other way to eliminate that threat but to shoot.

Many South Africans have applauded the court's decision on social media, saying justice has now been served for Ms Steenkamp.

This ruling is expected to go some way to show that no-one is above the law, not even South Africa's once beloved "blade runner".

---

The judge also rejected the argument that Pistorius had acted in self-defence.

He said that the athlete's life was not in danger at the time of the shooting, as Pistorius did not know who was behind the door or if they posed a threat.

The judge added that Pistorius did "not take that most elementary precaution of firing a warning shot".

It was earlier incorrectly reported that the court had ruled the manslaughter verdict would remain.

Pistorius did not attend the hearing in Bloemfontein.

But Ms Steenkamp's mother, June, was present and afterwards she was seen outside the court being embraced by members of the African National Congress Women's League, who were singing songs of celebration.

Our correspondent says that many in South Africa were upset by the original acquittal on murder charges, with women's rights groups arguing he should have been found guilty of murder as a deterrent because of the high number of women who are killed by their partners in the country.

Pistorius key dates:

• August 2012: Competes in London Olympics and Paralympics, where he won a gold medal

• February 2013: Shoots dead his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp

• March 2014: Trial begins

• September 2014: Judge finds Pistorius guilty of culpable homicide

• October 2014: Begins five-year sentence

• October 2015: Transferred to house arrest

• December 2015: Appeal court changes verdict to murder

---

The double amputee was released from prison on 19 October as he was eligible for release under "correctional supervision", having served a sixth of his sentence.

Pistorius can challenge the ruling in the constitutional court but only if his lawyers can argue that his constitutional rights have been violated.

Legal expert Mannie Witz told the BBC that there do not appear to be any grounds for such an appeal.

California shooting: Shock for Redlands, a town of 'innocent people'

Compared to the glitzy sprawl of nearby Los Angeles, Redlands is a tiny, understated town of around 70,000 people.

Police also believe it may have been home to the people responsible for one of the US's most deadly mass shootings.

At around 5pm on Wednesday, acting on a tip off, police raided a house on Redland's Center Street, a leafy residential road about 15 minutes' drive from where the San Bernardino shooting occurred.

Using battering rams, police smashed through a window and climbed in.

It was a quick but measured entry - police were worried the home might contain explosives.

From a house opposite, 20-year-old Adrian Tejeda filmed everything.

"[Police said] lock all the doors," he tells the BBC.

"I got some calls from family saying 'Have you seen the news?'.

"I said 'Yeah I can see it because I'm right here!'"

Late into Wednesday night police continued to search the property. The surrounding houses were quiet, curtains drawn.

But nowhere was forcibly evacuated, a police officer at the scene said, although some residents had opted to leave - perhaps more due to the 20 or so satellite trucks that had descended on the scene, rather than any worry over a possible threat to their safety.

As is so often the case in these shocking incidents, those who knew or came into contact with the suspect were surprised that something like this could possibly happen.

"What kind of neighbourhood is this?" Mr Tejeda continues. "It's peaceful. Nothing really bad happens.

"It's a bunch of innocent people."

He says he thought he had seen the at least one of the suspects in the past, going in and out of the house, but nothing ever stood out as being unusual or strange. Certainly nothing that hinted at what would take place in San Bernardino.

"That's crazy stuff to think they're living right next door to you," Mr Tejeda says.

Hours before the arrest, at an unconfirmed address in the same town, the suspected shooters Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik, both later killed by police, are said to have taken their six-month-old daughter to the home of Farook's mother.

According to a family spokesman, the couple said they had to go to a doctor's appointment.

Debate about what the shootings will mean for America's continued soul-searching on violence has already started here.

At a nearby bar, a man who did not want to be named said he worried that the shooting would be used to fuel anti-gun law arguments - due to California's apparently "restrictive" gun laws.

The state's strict - by American standards - regulations require passing a test to get hold of a weapon, and there is a waiting period.

But "Guns and Ammo" shops can still be seen peppered throughout the state, promoted with neon lights.

At least two of the weapons used in the shooting were bought legally, it has been established - news that will perhaps push the possibility of action even further away.

San Bernardino shooting: Explosives found at California attackers' home

The attackers who killed 14 people and wounded 21 at a social services centre in California had an arsenal of weaponry in their home, police say.

Bomb equipment, weapons and thousands of rounds of ammunition were found by police in a raid after Wednesday's shootout that killed the two suspects.

Authorities still have not found a motive in the attack by Syed Rizwan Farook, 28, and Tashfeen Malik, 27.

The names of the victims have now been released by San Bernardino's coroner.

Who are the victims?

Police said the attack indicated there had been "some degree of planning".

San Bernardino Police Chief Jarrod Burguan said it appeared that the duo was prepared to carry out another attack.

"There was obviously a mission here. We know that. We do not know why. We don't know if this was the intended target or if there was something that triggered him to do this immediately," said David Bowdich, assistant director of the FBI's Los Angeles office.

In the shootout with police hours after the attack, Farook and Malik fired 76 rounds of ammunition at the officers and the officers fired 380 rounds back.

Two police officers were injured during the pursuit.

It marks the deadliest mass shooting in the US since 26 people were killed at a school in Newtown, Connecticut in 2012.

What makes this shooting different? - Multiple attackers, a woman involved, a well-planned attack, explosives and a fleeing attempt

'It's crazy they lived next door' - Neighbours tell the BBC of their shock that the attackers lived nearby

Politicians 'shamed' for offering prayers - Does prayer do anything in the wake of a shooting?

---

Authorities are expected to start releasing the names of the victims on Thursday.

President Barack Obama said the FBI had taken over the investigation from local authorities.

"It is possible that this was terrorist-related, but we don't know. It's also possible that this was workplace-related," Mr Obama said.

The FBI cautioned that authorities needed time to investigate. But many Republican presidential candidates such as New Jersey Governor Chris Christie were convinced it was terrorism.

Former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge told the BBC said the information already made public points to terrorism.

"I would characterise this as a terrorist attack," he said. "Workplace attacks are a lot more spontaneous, they're not planned their not premeditated, they normal involve one person, they never involve pipe bombs."

Law enforcement officials are also looking at possible "co-conspirators" and have been in touch with the suspects' relatives.

Farook, who was born in the US, was not "on the radar" of law enforcement, Mr Burguan said.

He worked for the past five years as a restaurant inspector for the San Bernardino County Health Department. The Los Angeles Times reported that co-workers said he was a devout Muslim but rarely discussed his religion.

He and Malik were recently married and had a six-month-old baby, who they dropped off at its grandmother's house before the attack.

On Wednesday, Farook and his colleagues were attending a holiday party at the Inland Regional Center.

Co-worker Patrick Baccari said he was sitting at the same table as Farook before he abruptly left, leaving his coat.

Wearing military-style clothing and armed with assault rifles and semi-automatic handguns, Farook returned with Malik a short time later to open fire.

When the shooting started, Mr Baccari took refuge in a bathroom and was hurt when shrapnel sliced through the wall.

"If I hadn't been in the bathroom, I'd probably be laying dead on the floor," he said.

San Bernardino: Police seek motive in mass shooting

by BBC NEWS

US police are trying to establish why a man and woman opened fire at a social services centre in California, killing 14 people and wounding 17 more.

The pair, named as Syed Rizwan Farook, 28, and Tashfeen Malik, 27, were killed in an exchange of fire with police.

President Obama said it was "just too easy" for individuals to carry out such mass shootings in the US.

He said it was possible the latest incident was terror-related but the authorities do not know at this stage.

The FBI is investigating terrorism and a workplace grudge as possible motives, the bureau's Los Angeles office said earlier.

The incident took place at the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, where Farook worked.

It marks the deadliest mass shooting in the US since 26 people were killed at a school in Newtown, Connecticut in 2012.

Farook and Malik are thought to be a couple with a six-month-old baby. Police said the attack indicated there had been "some degree of planning".

The attack took place at an event on Wednesday for Farook's colleagues, which Farook attended.

He had been a San Bernardino public health employee for five years, police chief Jarrod Burguan said.

Mr Burguan said that Farook had left the event "under some circumstances that were described as angry".

He returned with Malik to open fire, armed with assault rifles and semi-automatic handguns and wearing military-style clothing.

Hundreds of people were evacuated as police officers swept through the massive complex.

Others locked themselves in rooms waiting for police to arrive.

Terry Petit's daughter, who works at the centre, sent him a text message from inside the centre, according to the Associated Press.

She wrote: "People shot. In the office waiting for cops. Pray for us. I am locked in an office."

Both suspects were killed in their vehicle after a shoot-out with police involving 20 officers. A tip-off had earlier led police to a house in nearby Redlands.

A third person seen running from the scene was detained, but police said it was unclear whether they were involved.

The authorities said all the weapons had been purchased legally but did not explain how they got into the hands of the perpetrators.

Three explosives devices were also found at the centre.

Farook, who was born in the US, worked for the county as an environmental health specialist, police said.

They had no information on whether he had a criminal record, nor further details on Malik.

Colleagues told the Los Angeles Times that Farook had travelled to Saudi Arabia and returned with a new wife. The couple had a young baby, they said.

The pair had dropped off their infant with relatives early on Wednesday, Hussam Ayloush of the Council on American-Islamic Relations said after talking with family.

Farook's brother-in-law Farhan Khan told a press conference he had "absolutely no idea" what could have prompted the shooting.

The mass shooting comes just days after three people were killed at a Colorado Planned Parenthood clinic.